1951 Buick 40 vs. 2003 Toyota Caldina

To start off, 2003 Toyota Caldina is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Toyota Caldina (130 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1951 Buick 40. (119 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Caldina should accelerate faster than 1951 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Buick 40 weights approximately 390 kg more than 2003 Toyota Caldina.

Because 1951 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Caldina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Buick 40 (292 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Toyota Caldina. (170 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1951 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Toyota Caldina.

Compare all specifications:

1951 Buick 40 2003 Toyota Caldina
Make Buick Toyota
Model 40 Caldina
Year Released 1951 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4066 cc 1762 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 119 HP 130 HP
Engine RPM 3600 RPM 5700 RPM
Torque 292 Nm 170 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 4200 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1635 kg 1245 kg
Vehicle Width 1950 mm 1750 mm
Wheelbase Size 3090 mm 2710 mm