1951 Buick 40 vs. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover

To start off, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP) has 163 more horse power than 1951 Buick 40. (119 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1951 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 805 kg more than 1951 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Buick 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover (441 Nm) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Buick 40. (292 Nm). This means 2005 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Buick 40.

Compare all specifications: