1951 Buick 40 vs. 2009 Renault Koleos
To start off, 2009 Renault Koleos is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Renault Koleos (169 HP) has 50 more horse power than 1951 Buick 40. (119 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Renault Koleos should accelerate faster than 1951 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Renault Koleos weights approximately 15 kg more than 1951 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Renault Koleos is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Buick 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Renault Koleos will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Buick 40 | 2009 Renault Koleos | |
| Make | Buick | Renault |
| Model | 40 | Koleos |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4066 cc | 2488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 119 HP | 169 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1650 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1855 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2690 mm |
