1951 Buick 40 vs. 2009 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2009 Subaru Outback is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Subaru Outback (243 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1951 Buick 40. (119 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 1951 Buick 40.
Because 2009 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Buick 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Subaru Outback (327 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Buick 40. (292 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Subaru Outback will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Buick 40 | 2009 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Buick | Subaru |
Model | 40 | Outback |
Year Released | 1951 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 2457 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 243 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 292 Nm | 327 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.5 mm | 99.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 104.8 mm | 79 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2680 mm |