1951 Buick 40 vs. 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet
To start off, 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Buick 40 (119 HP) has 20 more horse power than 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet. (99 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet.
Because 1951 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Buick 40 | 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet | |
| Make | Buick | Aston Martin |
| Model | 40 | Cygnet |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4066 cc | 1300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 119 HP | 99 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
