1951 Buick 40 vs. 2012 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XJ is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jaguar XJ (271 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1951 Buick 40. (119 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1951 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 161 kg more than 1951 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jaguar XJ (600 Nm) has 308 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Buick 40. (292 Nm). This means 2012 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Buick 40 | 2012 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Buick | Jaguar |
Model | 40 | XJ |
Year Released | 1951 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 271 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 292 Nm | 600 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1796 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1895 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 3157 mm |