1951 Buick LeSabre vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1963 Triumph 2000 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Buick LeSabre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Buick LeSabre would be higher. At 3,523 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Buick LeSabre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Buick LeSabre (335 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 205 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (130 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Buick LeSabre should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Buick LeSabre weights approximately 528 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1951 Buick LeSabre (517 Nm @ 3650 RPM) has 319 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (198 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1951 Buick LeSabre will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Buick LeSabre | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Buick | Triumph |
| Model | LeSabre | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3523 cc | 2498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 335 HP | 130 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 517 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3650 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 74.8 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82.6 mm | 95 mm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1723 kg | 1195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2700 mm |
