1951 Buick LeSabre vs. 2005 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2005 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Buick LeSabre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Buick LeSabre would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Buick LeSabre (335 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 2005 Jeep Wrangler. (191 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Buick LeSabre should accelerate faster than 2005 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 2005 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Buick LeSabre. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Buick LeSabre (517 Nm) has 198 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Jeep Wrangler. (319 Nm). This means 1951 Buick LeSabre will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Buick LeSabre | 2005 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Buick | Jeep |
Model | LeSabre | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1951 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3523 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 335 HP | 191 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 517 Nm | 319 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 99 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.6 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 151 L | 72 L |