1951 Buick LeSabre vs. 2012 Holden UTE
To start off, 2012 Holden UTE is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Buick LeSabre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Buick LeSabre would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Buick LeSabre (335 HP) has 93 more horse power than 2012 Holden UTE. (242 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Buick LeSabre should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden UTE.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Buick LeSabre (517 Nm) has 187 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden UTE. (330 Nm). This means 1951 Buick LeSabre will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden UTE. 1951 Buick LeSabre has automatic transmission and 2012 Holden UTE has manual transmission. 2012 Holden UTE will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1951 Buick LeSabre will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Buick LeSabre | 2012 Holden UTE | |
Make | Buick | Holden |
Model | LeSabre | UTE |
Year Released | 1951 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3523 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 335 HP | 242 HP |
Torque | 517 Nm | 330 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |