1951 Cadillac 62 vs. 1948 Morgan F Super
To start off, 1951 Cadillac 62 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Morgan F Super. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Morgan F Super would be higher. At 5,422 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Cadillac 62 (160 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1948 Morgan F Super. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1948 Morgan F Super.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Cadillac 62 | 1948 Morgan F Super | |
Make | Cadillac | Morgan |
Model | 62 | F Super |
Year Released | 1951 | 1948 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5422 cc | 1267 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 5480 mm | 3460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2340 mm |