1951 Cadillac 62 vs. 1953 Morris Minor

To start off, 1953 Morris Minor is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,422 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Cadillac 62 (160 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1953 Morris Minor. (27 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1953 Morris Minor. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 962 kg more than 1953 Morris Minor. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Cadillac 62 (423 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 370 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Morris Minor. (53 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1951 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Morris Minor.

Compare all specifications:

1951 Cadillac 62 1953 Morris Minor
Make Cadillac Morris
Model 62 Minor
Year Released 1951 1953
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5422 cc 918 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 160 HP 27 HP
Engine RPM 3800 RPM 4400 RPM
Torque 423 Nm 53 Nm
Torque RPM 1800 RPM 2400 RPM
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1752 kg 790 kg
Vehicle Length 5480 mm 3770 mm
Vehicle Width 2050 mm 1560 mm
Vehicle Height 1600 mm 1530 mm
Wheelbase Size 3210 mm 2190 mm