1951 Cadillac 62 vs. 1955 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 1955 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,422 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Ford Thunderbird (223 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1951 Cadillac 62. (160 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1955 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1951 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 242 kg more than 1955 Ford Thunderbird.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Cadillac 62 | 1955 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | 62 | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 1951 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5422 cc | 5112 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 223 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5480 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2600 mm |