1951 Cadillac 62 vs. 1968 Seat 600
To start off, 1968 Seat 600 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,422 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Cadillac 62 (160 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1968 Seat 600. (24 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1968 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1177 kg more than 1968 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Cadillac 62 | 1968 Seat 600 | |
Make | Cadillac | Seat |
Model | 62 | 600 |
Year Released | 1951 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 5422 cc | 767 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5480 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2010 mm |