1951 Cadillac 62 vs. 1969 Maserati Quattroporte
To start off, 1969 Maserati Quattroporte is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,422 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Maserati Quattroporte (286 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1951 Cadillac 62. (160 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Maserati Quattroporte should accelerate faster than 1951 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 22 kg more than 1969 Maserati Quattroporte.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Cadillac 62 | 1969 Maserati Quattroporte | |
| Make | Cadillac | Maserati |
| Model | 62 | Quattroporte |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5422 cc | 4709 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 286 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 1730 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5480 mm | 4990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2760 mm |
