1951 Cadillac 62 vs. 1974 Holden Torana
To start off, 1974 Holden Torana is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,422 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Holden Torana (239 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1951 Cadillac 62. (160 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Holden Torana should accelerate faster than 1951 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 542 kg more than 1974 Holden Torana.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 Holden Torana (427 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Cadillac 62. (423 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1974 Holden Torana will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Cadillac 62.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Cadillac 62 | 1974 Holden Torana | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | 62 | Torana |
Year Released | 1951 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5422 cc | 5044 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 239 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 423 Nm | 427 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5480 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2590 mm |