1951 Cadillac 62 vs. 1975 Toyota Century
To start off, 1975 Toyota Century is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,422 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Cadillac 62 (160 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1975 Toyota Century. (157 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1975 Toyota Century. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Toyota Century weights approximately 13 kg more than 1951 Cadillac 62.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Cadillac 62 (423 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Toyota Century. (270 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1951 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Toyota Century.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Cadillac 62 | 1975 Toyota Century | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | 62 | Century |
Year Released | 1951 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5422 cc | 3376 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 157 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 423 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 1765 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5480 mm | 4990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2870 mm |