1951 Cadillac 62 vs. 1981 GMC Suburban
To start off, 1981 GMC Suburban is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,210 cc (8 cylinders), 1981 GMC Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Cadillac 62 (160 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1981 GMC Suburban. (129 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1981 GMC Suburban. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 GMC Suburban weights approximately 643 kg more than 1951 Cadillac 62.
Because 1981 GMC Suburban is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 GMC Suburban will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Cadillac 62 (423 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 GMC Suburban. (326 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1951 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 GMC Suburban.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Cadillac 62 | 1981 GMC Suburban | |
Make | Cadillac | GMC |
Model | 62 | Suburban |
Year Released | 1951 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5422 cc | 6210 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 423 Nm | 326 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 2395 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5480 mm | 5480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 3300 mm |