1951 Cadillac 62 vs. 1983 Renault 9
To start off, 1983 Renault 9 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,422 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Cadillac 62 (160 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1983 Renault 9. (47 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1983 Renault 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 932 kg more than 1983 Renault 9. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Cadillac 62 | 1983 Renault 9 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Renault |
| Model | 62 | 9 |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5422 cc | 1107 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 96.8 mm | 70 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92.1 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 6.7:1 | 9.2:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5480 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2490 mm |
