1951 Cadillac 62 vs. 1985 Citroen CX
To start off, 1985 Citroen CX is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,422 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Cadillac 62 (160 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1985 Citroen CX. (137 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1985 Citroen CX.
Because 1951 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Cadillac 62 (423 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 217 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Citroen CX. (206 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1951 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Cadillac 62 | 1985 Citroen CX | |
| Make | Cadillac | Citroen |
| Model | 62 | CX |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1985 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5422 cc | 2499 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 137 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 423 Nm | 206 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 5480 mm | 4930 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 3100 mm |
