1951 Cadillac 62 vs. 1989 Acura Integra
To start off, 1989 Acura Integra is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,422 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Cadillac 62 (160 HP) has 47 more horse power than 1989 Acura Integra. (113 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1989 Acura Integra.
Because 1951 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Cadillac 62 | 1989 Acura Integra | |
Make | Cadillac | Acura |
Model | 62 | Integra |
Year Released | 1951 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5422 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 113 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5480 mm | 4285 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1665 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2450 mm |