1951 Cadillac 62 vs. 1991 Mahindra Armada
To start off, 1991 Mahindra Armada is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,422 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Cadillac 62 (160 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1991 Mahindra Armada. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1991 Mahindra Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 248 kg more than 1951 Cadillac 62.
Because 1991 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Cadillac 62 | 1991 Mahindra Armada | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mahindra |
| Model | 62 | Armada |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1991 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5422 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 2000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5480 mm | 4310 mm |
