1951 Cadillac 62 vs. 1992 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 1992 Toyota Lite Ace is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,422 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 652 kg more than 1992 Toyota Lite Ace.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Cadillac 62 | 1992 Toyota Lite Ace | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | 62 | Lite Ace |
Year Released | 1951 | 1992 |
Engine Size | 5422 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5480 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1910 mm |