1951 Cadillac 62 vs. 1996 Toyota Conquest
To start off, 1996 Toyota Conquest is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,422 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Toyota Conquest (174 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1951 Cadillac 62. (160 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Toyota Conquest should accelerate faster than 1951 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 636 kg more than 1996 Toyota Conquest.
Let's talk about torque, 1951 Cadillac 62 (423 Nm) has 288 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Toyota Conquest. (135 Nm). This means 1951 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Toyota Conquest.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Cadillac 62 | 1996 Toyota Conquest | |
| Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
| Model | 62 | Conquest |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1996 |
| Engine Size | 5422 cc | 1973 cc |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 174 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 423 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 1116 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2740 mm |
