1951 Cadillac 62 vs. 1997 Chrysler Viper
To start off, 1997 Chrysler Viper is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,984 cc (10 cylinders), 1997 Chrysler Viper is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Chrysler Viper (389 HP @ 5150 RPM) has 229 more horse power than 1951 Cadillac 62. (160 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Chrysler Viper should accelerate faster than 1951 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 162 kg more than 1997 Chrysler Viper.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Chrysler Viper (620 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Cadillac 62. (423 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1997 Chrysler Viper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Cadillac 62.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Cadillac 62 | 1997 Chrysler Viper | |
Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
Model | 62 | Viper |
Year Released | 1951 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5422 cc | 7984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 389 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5150 RPM |
Torque | 423 Nm | 620 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 1590 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5480 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1130 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2450 mm |