1951 Cadillac 62 vs. 1999 Renault Clio
To start off, 1999 Renault Clio is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Cadillac 62 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 817 kg more than 1999 Renault Clio.
Because 1951 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Cadillac 62 | 1999 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Cadillac | Renault |
| Model | 62 | Clio |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 0 HP |
| Top Speed | 145 km/hour | 181 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 935 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5480 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2770 mm |
