1951 Cadillac 62 vs. 2002 Dacia Supernova
To start off, 2002 Dacia Supernova is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,422 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Cadillac 62 (160 HP) has 86 more horse power than 2002 Dacia Supernova. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2002 Dacia Supernova. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 802 kg more than 2002 Dacia Supernova. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1951 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Dacia Supernova, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Cadillac 62 | 2002 Dacia Supernova | |
Make | Cadillac | Dacia |
Model | 62 | Supernova |
Year Released | 1951 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5422 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 74 HP |
Top Speed | 145 km/hour | 168 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5480 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1400 mm |