1951 Cadillac 62 vs. 2002 Holden Astra

To start off, 2002 Holden Astra is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,422 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Cadillac 62 (160 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2002 Holden Astra. (120 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2002 Holden Astra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 602 kg more than 2002 Holden Astra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1951 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Holden Astra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Cadillac 62 (423 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 258 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Holden Astra. (165 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1951 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Holden Astra.

Compare all specifications: