1951 Cadillac 62 vs. 2003 Holden Statesman
To start off, 2003 Holden Statesman is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,422 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Holden Statesman (229 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1951 Cadillac 62. (160 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Holden Statesman should accelerate faster than 1951 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 27 kg more than 2003 Holden Statesman.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Cadillac 62 (423 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Holden Statesman. (375 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1951 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Holden Statesman.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Cadillac 62 | 2003 Holden Statesman | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | 62 | Statesman |
Year Released | 1951 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5422 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 229 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 423 Nm | 375 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 1725 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5480 mm | 5200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2950 mm |