1951 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 Porsche Cayenne
To start off, 2004 Porsche Cayenne is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,422 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Porsche Cayenne (247 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1951 Cadillac 62. (160 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Porsche Cayenne should accelerate faster than 1951 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 347 kg more than 2004 Porsche Cayenne.
Because 2004 Porsche Cayenne is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Porsche Cayenne will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Cadillac 62 (423 Nm) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Porsche Cayenne. (321 Nm). This means 1951 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Porsche Cayenne.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Cadillac 62 | 2004 Porsche Cayenne | |
| Make | Cadillac | Porsche |
| Model | 62 | Cayenne |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5422 cc | 3196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 247 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 423 Nm | 321 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 1405 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2360 mm |
