1951 Cadillac 62 vs. 2006 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2006 Dodge Ram is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,621 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Ram (345 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 185 more horse power than 1951 Cadillac 62. (160 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1951 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 2 kg more than 2006 Dodge Ram.
Because 2006 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Ram (509 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Cadillac 62. (423 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2006 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Cadillac 62.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Cadillac 62 | 2006 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Cadillac | Dodge |
Model | 62 | Ram |
Year Released | 1951 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5422 cc | 5621 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 345 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 423 Nm | 509 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 6.7:1 | 9.9:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 1750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5480 mm | 6300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 4080 mm |