1951 Cadillac 62 vs. 2007 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2007 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,422 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Jeep Wrangler (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1951 Cadillac 62. (160 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1951 Cadillac 62.
Because 2007 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Cadillac 62 (423 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Jeep Wrangler. (321 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1951 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Cadillac 62 | 2007 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Cadillac | Jeep |
Model | 62 | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1951 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5422 cc | 3776 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 423 Nm | 321 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96.8 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.1 mm | 90.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 6.7:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5480 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2950 mm |