1951 Cadillac 62 vs. 2007 Nissan 1400
To start off, 2007 Nissan 1400 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,422 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Cadillac 62 (160 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 2007 Nissan 1400. (63 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2007 Nissan 1400.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Cadillac 62 (423 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 326 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Nissan 1400. (97 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1951 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Nissan 1400.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Cadillac 62 | 2007 Nissan 1400 | |
Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
Model | 62 | 1400 |
Year Released | 1951 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5422 cc | 1397 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 63 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 423 Nm | 97 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 6.7:1 | 9.4:1 |
Top Speed | 145 km/hour | 141 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5480 mm | 3850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2310 mm |