1951 Cadillac 62 vs. 2008 Daewoo Lacetti

To start off, 2008 Daewoo Lacetti is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,422 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Cadillac 62 (160 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2008 Daewoo Lacetti. (120 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2008 Daewoo Lacetti. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 675 kg more than 2008 Daewoo Lacetti. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1951 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Daewoo Lacetti, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Cadillac 62 (423 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 262 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Daewoo Lacetti. (161 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1951 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Daewoo Lacetti.

Compare all specifications:

1951 Cadillac 62 2008 Daewoo Lacetti
Make Cadillac Daewoo
Model 62 Lacetti
Year Released 1951 2008
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5422 cc 1798 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 160 HP 120 HP
Engine RPM 3800 RPM 5800 RPM
Torque 423 Nm 161 Nm
Torque RPM 1800 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 96.8 mm 81.6 mm
Engine Stroke Size 92.1 mm 86 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 6.7:1 10.0:1
Top Speed 145 km/hour 194 km/hour
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1752 kg 1077 kg
Vehicle Length 5480 mm 4300 mm
Vehicle Width 2050 mm 1730 mm
Vehicle Height 1600 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 3210 mm 2610 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]