1951 Cadillac 62 vs. 2008 Ford Falcon

To start off, 2008 Ford Falcon is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,422 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford Falcon (362 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 202 more horse power than 1951 Cadillac 62. (160 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1951 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 48 kg more than 2008 Ford Falcon.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Ford Falcon (533 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Cadillac 62. (423 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2008 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Cadillac 62.

Compare all specifications:

1951 Cadillac 62 2008 Ford Falcon
Make Cadillac Ford
Model 62 Falcon
Year Released 1951 2008
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5422 cc 3983 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 160 HP 362 HP
Engine RPM 3800 RPM 5250 RPM
Torque 423 Nm 533 Nm
Torque RPM 1800 RPM 2000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 96.8 mm 92.3 mm
Engine Stroke Size 92.1 mm 99.3 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 6.7:1 8.8:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1752 kg 1704 kg
Vehicle Length 5480 mm 4967 mm
Vehicle Width 2050 mm 1868 mm
Vehicle Height 1600 mm 1433 mm
Wheelbase Size 3210 mm 2838 mm