1951 Cadillac 62 vs. 2008 Hummer H3
To start off, 2008 Hummer H3 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,422 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Hummer H3 weights approximately 479 kg more than 1951 Cadillac 62.
Because 2008 Hummer H3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Hummer H3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Cadillac 62 (423 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Hummer H3. (328 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 1951 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Hummer H3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Cadillac 62 | 2008 Hummer H3 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Hummer |
| Model | 62 | H3 |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5422 cc | 3653 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 423 Nm | 328 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 6.7:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 2231 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5480 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 2020 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2850 mm |
