1951 Cadillac 62 vs. 2008 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2008 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,422 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (270 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1951 Cadillac 62. (160 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1951 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 423 kg more than 2008 Mazda CX-9.
Because 2008 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Cadillac 62 (423 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda CX-9. (370 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1951 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda CX-9.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Cadillac 62 | 2008 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | 62 | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1951 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5422 cc | 3725 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 423 Nm | 370 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 1329 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5480 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2880 mm |