1951 Cadillac 62 vs. 2008 Opel Movano
To start off, 2008 Opel Movano is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,422 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Opel Movano weights approximately 137 kg more than 1951 Cadillac 62.
Because 1951 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Opel Movano, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Cadillac 62 (423 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Opel Movano. (290 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 1951 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Opel Movano.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Cadillac 62 | 2008 Opel Movano | |
| Make | Cadillac | Opel |
| Model | 62 | Movano |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2008 |
| Engine Size | 5422 cc | 2462 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 423 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 1600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 96.8 mm | 89 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92.1 mm | 99 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 6.7:1 | 17.8:1 |
| Top Speed | 145 km/hour | 145 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 1889 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5480 mm | 3540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 3580 mm |
