1951 Cadillac 62 vs. 2008 Tata Sumo
To start off, 2008 Tata Sumo is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,422 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Cadillac 62 (160 HP) has 93 more horse power than 2008 Tata Sumo. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2008 Tata Sumo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Tata Sumo weights approximately 128 kg more than 1951 Cadillac 62.
Because 2008 Tata Sumo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Tata Sumo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Cadillac 62 (423 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 304 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Tata Sumo. (119 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1951 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Tata Sumo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Cadillac 62 | 2008 Tata Sumo | |
| Make | Cadillac | Tata |
| Model | 62 | Sumo |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5422 cc | 1948 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 67 HP |
| Torque | 423 Nm | 119 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 1880 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5480 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2410 mm |
