1951 Cadillac 62 vs. 2009 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,422 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Cadillac 62 (160 HP) has 6 more horse power than 2009 Citroen C-Crosser. (154 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2009 Citroen C-Crosser.
Because 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Cadillac 62 (423 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Citroen C-Crosser. (380 Nm). This means 1951 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Citroen C-Crosser.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Cadillac 62 | 2009 Citroen C-Crosser | |
| Make | Cadillac | Citroen |
| Model | 62 | C-Crosser |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5422 cc | 2179 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 154 HP |
| Torque | 423 Nm | 380 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 96.8 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92.1 mm | 96 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
