1951 Cadillac 62 vs. 2009 Fiat Croma
To start off, 2009 Fiat Croma is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,422 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Cadillac 62 (160 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2009 Fiat Croma. (138 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2009 Fiat Croma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 247 kg more than 2009 Fiat Croma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1951 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Fiat Croma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Cadillac 62 (423 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 248 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Fiat Croma. (175 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1951 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Fiat Croma.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Cadillac 62 | 2009 Fiat Croma | |
| Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
| Model | 62 | Croma |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5422 cc | 1794 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 138 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Torque | 423 Nm | 175 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 96.8 mm | 80.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92.1 mm | 88.2 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 6.7:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Top Speed | 145 km/hour | 206 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 1505 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5480 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2710 mm |
