1951 Cadillac 62 vs. 2009 Honda Civic
To start off, 2009 Honda Civic is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,422 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Cadillac 62 (160 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2009 Honda Civic. (138 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2009 Honda Civic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 623 kg more than 2009 Honda Civic. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1951 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Honda Civic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Cadillac 62 (423 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 249 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Honda Civic. (174 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1951 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Honda Civic.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Cadillac 62 | 2009 Honda Civic | |
Make | Cadillac | Honda |
Model | 62 | Civic |
Year Released | 1951 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5422 cc | 1798 cc |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 423 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96.8 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.1 mm | 87.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 6.7:1 | 10.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 1129 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5480 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2710 mm |