1951 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 BMW 120

To start off, 2010 BMW 120 is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,422 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 BMW 120 (168 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1951 Cadillac 62. (160 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 BMW 120 should accelerate faster than 1951 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 227 kg more than 2010 BMW 120.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Cadillac 62 (423 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 213 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 BMW 120. (210 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1951 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 BMW 120.

Compare all specifications:

1951 Cadillac 62 2010 BMW 120
Make Cadillac BMW
Model 62 120
Year Released 1951 2010
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5422 cc 1995 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 160 HP 168 HP
Engine RPM 3800 RPM 6700 RPM
Torque 423 Nm 210 Nm
Torque RPM 1800 RPM 4250 RPM
Engine Bore Size 96.8 mm 84.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 92.1 mm 90 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 6.7:1 12.0:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Weight 1752 kg 1525 kg
Vehicle Length 5480 mm 4370 mm
Vehicle Width 2050 mm 1910 mm
Vehicle Height 1600 mm 1760 mm
Wheelbase Size 3210 mm 2670 mm