1951 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 2010 Fiat Bravo is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,422 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Cadillac 62 (160 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2010 Fiat Bravo. (148 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2010 Fiat Bravo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 396 kg more than 2010 Fiat Bravo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1951 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Fiat Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Cadillac 62 (423 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 217 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Fiat Bravo. (206 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 1951 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Fiat Bravo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Fiat Bravo | |
| Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
| Model | 62 | Bravo |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5422 cc | 1368 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 423 Nm | 206 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2250 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 96.8 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92.1 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 6.7:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Top Speed | 145 km/hour | 212 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 1356 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5480 mm | 4340 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2610 mm |
