1951 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Suzuki Swift
To start off, 2010 Suzuki Swift is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,422 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Suzuki Swift is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Suzuki Swift will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Suzuki Swift | |
Make | Cadillac | Suzuki |
Model | 62 | Swift |
Year Released | 1951 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5422 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5480 mm | 3850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2430 mm |