1951 Cadillac 62 vs. 2011 Chevrolet Cruze
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Cruze is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,422 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Cadillac 62 (160 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2011 Chevrolet Cruze. (136 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2011 Chevrolet Cruze.
Because 1951 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Cadillac 62 (423 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 256 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Chevrolet Cruze. (167 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1951 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Chevrolet Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Cadillac 62 | 2011 Chevrolet Cruze | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | 62 | Cruze |
Year Released | 1951 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5422 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 136 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 423 Nm | 167 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5480 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1796 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1476 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2685 mm |