1951 Cadillac 62 vs. 2012 Holden UTE
To start off, 2012 Holden UTE is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 197 more horse power than 1951 Cadillac 62. (160 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1951 Cadillac 62.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Cadillac 62. (423 Nm). This means 2012 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Cadillac 62.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Cadillac 62 | 2012 Holden UTE | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | 62 | UTE |
Year Released | 1951 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5422 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 357 HP |
Torque | 423 Nm | 530 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |