1951 Cadillac 62 vs. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Cadillac 62 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 918 kg more than 1951 Cadillac 62.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom (720 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 297 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Cadillac 62. (423 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Cadillac 62.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Cadillac 62 | 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
| Make | Cadillac | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | 62 | Phantom |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5350 RPM |
| Torque | 423 Nm | 720 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 96.8 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92.1 mm | 84 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 2670 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5480 mm | 6092 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 3820 mm |
