1951 Citroen 11 vs. 2003 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2003 Smart ForTwo is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Citroen 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Citroen 11 would be higher. At 1,909 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Citroen 11 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Smart ForTwo (60 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1951 Citroen 11. (55 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Smart ForTwo should accelerate faster than 1951 Citroen 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Citroen 11 weights approximately 305 kg more than 2003 Smart ForTwo.
Because 2003 Smart ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Smart ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 Citroen 11, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Citroen 11 | 2003 Smart ForTwo | |
| Make | Citroen | Smart |
| Model | 11 | ForTwo |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1909 cc | 698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 55 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 815 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 1820 mm |
