1951 Citroen 11 vs. 2009 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2009 Ford Ranger is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Citroen 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Citroen 11 would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1951 Citroen 11. (55 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1951 Citroen 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Citroen 11 weights approximately 98 kg more than 2009 Ford Ranger.
Because 2009 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 Citroen 11, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Citroen 11 | 2009 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | 11 | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1909 cc | 4015 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 55 HP | 207 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1022 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 3200 mm |
