1951 Citroen 15 vs. 2009 Tata Nano
To start off, 2009 Tata Nano is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Citroen 15. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Citroen 15 would be higher. At 2,867 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Citroen 15 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Citroen 15 (76 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2009 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Citroen 15 should accelerate faster than 2009 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Citroen 15 weights approximately 726 kg more than 2009 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 Citroen 15, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Citroen 15 (187 Nm) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Tata Nano. (48 Nm). This means 1951 Citroen 15 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Tata Nano.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Citroen 15 | 2009 Tata Nano | |
| Make | Citroen | Tata |
| Model | 15 | Nano |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2867 cc | 624 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 76 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 187 Nm | 48 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 73.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 73.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 6.2:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3099 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1495 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1652 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 2230 mm |
